The Citation Network · Authorities

The Sources Behind the Connections

Read the opinions, statutory text and court records supporting the selected authorities and relationships. Each entry identifies its version and provides the retained source alongside a complete reading copy.

A case’s treatment and a statute’s version matter. The network explains those distinctions; the source texts below remain separate from that commentary.

Find a source

32 sources

AB 2288 — Stats. 2024, ch. 44

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Chaptered July 1, 2024; selected 07/01/24 - Chaptered
Relevant passages: § 1, including new § 2699(c), (e)(2), (p), (v); §§ 2–3

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Chaptered bill caption, digest, complete § 1 statutory unit and §§ 2–3; statutory unit compared with the completely read current § 2699 and technical changes checked.

Retained source · 49,404 bytes
86233c8e703e13b5bb907fa42b89ad83fa695062d3ccbe3f8d1aede1b7018ecf

Reading copy · 21,771 bytes
5da497266d0581d205707d44002d1561ede31183f55936b352668b83564f8fd6

Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2023) 14 Cal.5th 1104

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: 2023-07-17 official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip pp. 7–17

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: FAA framework, III standing analysis and IV.A confirmed-arbitration qualification (official slip pp. 7–17).

Retained source · 243,128 bytes
be75827ffb7491b70bc1380b52e44e81beab7ee8ecfdc50763453b4336d27e04

Reading copy · 51,500 bytes
ccaa1d80fd3418ac0f90a65271ed7b02a3f51ec279c1e056433395fed460d01b

Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp. of California (2018) 4 Cal.5th 542

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: Filed 2018-03-05; S232607; official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip opinion pp. 26–29, 32–37, including fn. 12

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Flat-sum divisor, multiplier and production-bonus distinctions, slip pp. 26–37, including fns. 10–12, and disposition; prior verified regular-rate review reused.

Retained source · 399,722 bytes
3b1136f29e9ddf071d7393f40522a496d223c8646b4a7dbe070c2e2a589aa4b4

Reading copy · 84,276 bytes
1803608c8a2be251751a441c251dfed2bb7a7b5cb988215be1d88f36f47a92c2

Augustus v. ABM Security Services, Inc. (2016) 2 Cal.5th 257

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: Filed 2016-12-22; S224853; official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip opinion pp. 1, 10–11, 14–17, 21; Read with current Lab. Code, § 226.7(f)(1)–(5), (g), separately retained as lab226-7

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Introductory holding, statutory/wage-order text and no-on-call reasoning, slip pp. 1, 10–11, 14–17, and disposition p. 21. Current statutory exception separately reviewed in full through shared lab226-7.

Retained source · 450,545 bytes
5362cbc6ae7eaab37005c66dec5df8940d14a79b2e38f0126577a13ec50bd0ef

Reading copy · 73,249 bytes
034e225616d5dce61fdf36e557da44751d117d00531e00b58af0065ded85f92b

Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004

Source: California Supreme Court; official-reporter facsimile preserved by Caselaw Access Project
Version: Filed 2012-04-12; S166350; official-reporter facsimile
Relevant passages: 53 Cal.4th pp. 1033, 1036–1041, including fn. 19

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Rest-duty qualification at reporter p. 1033 and meal-period-duty unit pp. 1036–1041, including fn. 19. Prior verified opinion preparation reused; p. 1040 visually checked against reporter facsimile.

Retained source · 3,008,876 bytes
3a000d15ac9a1fea91760ecb29d3500b67e6ca4b61c33e29c2b46a8c09a0f110

Reading copy · 133,389 bytes
72a1faae3d4e5bec55d4178c66ca70b2b4ad21ec3e1d12561066ed924f1512ac

Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. (2024) 15 Cal.5th 582

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: 2024-01-18 official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip p. 2 & fns. 4–5; pp. 41–45

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Introduction/holding with disapproval and due-process reservation; full final case-management discussion and conclusion (slip pp. 41–45).

Retained source · 348,534 bytes
fe50ef1700d6a86aaa5c03c94d4e04db494d02f61ce00e8c1cc978d8c3187796

Reading copy · 90,772 bytes
bc921b1fdc5a082a4e2052e3b09734ce90f0ed491a27ee98d0d1b4badadaa45d

Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC (2021) 11 Cal.5th 858

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: Filed 2021-07-15; S259172; official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip opinion pp. 1–2, 25–29

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Introduction identifying the statutory question and complete conclusion/retroactivity unit, slip pp. 1–2 and 25–29; prior verified regular-rate review reused.

Retained source · 399,274 bytes
af555a31c7e14131c683d622a26260278ef6c2987bdf6b1cad5cf9e8ca6649a2

Reading copy · 59,876 bytes
27abb909897911963fd1da55a82872be9367d43d04bfb4b96064b941712dc5da

Frlekin v. Apple Inc. (2020) 8 Cal.5th 1038

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: Filed 2020-02-13; S243805; official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip opinion pp. 1–3, 12–17, 22–26, including fns. 4, 6, 7

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Question presented and controlled-search facts, commuting/necessity distinction, control factors and final limited holding, slip pp. 1–3, 12–17, 22–26, including fns. 4, 6, 7.

Retained source · 524,138 bytes
d82419b916922cb2fc0c2d6d14e326d631389d83276fbfbe7240385fbe1046f4

Reading copy · 53,419 bytes
ed9b39611bf12777da470cf1dd8a8e123ab8aec355a82c1d34c4063284258933

Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348

Source: California Supreme Court; official reporter scan hosted by Caselaw Access Project
Version: 2014-06-23 official reporter opinion
Relevant passages: 59 Cal.4th pp. 378–384; pp. 386–387 (later-displaced FAA rationale)

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Complete PAGA overview and waiver units V.A–B (pp. 378–384); reviewed separate FAA rationale in conjunction with Viking River and Adolph.

Retained source · 3,550,972 bytes
1c11f524dffb0811eb08f66c7a1f3eff78ff8e4612a9a2e10c1d9e7b19ab2f3f

Reading copy · 155,513 bytes
1ebd14d4a56a5b7acd69ce9d9cb645cb390153bf18e164b49f7a0ffdbb6a3053

Kim v. Reins International California, Inc. (2020) 9 Cal.5th 73

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: 2020-03-12 official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip pp. 1–4, 6–10

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Introduction and statutory overview; complete II.A.1 statutory-language unit, including footnote 4.

Retained source · 374,013 bytes
864ac92930898e9a59e99988bb48cdd0d262e2e44db467986436187ea138a3c8

Reading copy · 42,164 bytes
a95e31ea4f38142d34fe31187d32faaaa9c29c37b1c3c960ee040ff5123821fa

Labor Code Part 13 — § 2698 and the PAGA framework

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Official current Part 13 capture, October 18, 2026; § 2698 added by Stats. 2003, ch. 906, § 2
Relevant passages: § 2698; Part 13 headings

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Complete § 2698 naming provision and part headings; §§ 2699 and 2699.3 reviewed through their separate complete captures.

Retained source · 181,254 bytes
0a1f2f930031f6b7c526d332def9bfec9870ecc79e8b16fca34326747e7e06fe

Reading copy · 49,336 bytes
5d8d8ce47cb4dca09db48cae3ed787466244064e2741339199a18c55d509cd7f

Labor Code § 203

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Stats. 2019, ch. 700, § 2.5 (SB 286), effective January 1, 2020
Relevant passages: § 203(a)–(b)

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Entire section (a)–(b), including amendment note.

Retained source · 4,408 bytes
735f1fcff877a459374fbee13357f17bc4995e822e1feff797a67757fb16bfba

Reading copy · 1,397 bytes
1e80173028e10cc0f1d4d29238544ba37e2bef8b9ec8bc72e37dd495d5a655e5

Labor Code § 226

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Stats. 2023, ch. 866, § 1 (SB 332), effective October 13, 2023
Relevant passages: § 226(a), (d)–(e), (i)–(j)

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Entire section (a)–(j), including coverage, injury and knowledge predicates, hours exceptions, and amendment note.

Retained source · 23,015 bytes
239db5be723a969eded15629bccad1d04c2bb83bd41b24d5d844c1787a8563b5

Reading copy · 9,961 bytes
f92faaa0fec8382ebce0e2486492c278d52a9c12605712da08c48d6dc4e954d6

Labor Code § 226.7

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Stats. 2020, ch. 343, § 2 (AB 1512), effective September 30, 2020; repeals January 1, 2027
Relevant passages: § 226.7(b)–(g), especially (f)(1)–(5)

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Entire operative section (a)–(g), including security-officer requirements, filed-case exception, express Augustus limitation and successor note.

Retained source · 12,122 bytes
70f44d4a0528673a7ab6cee0ea71ab09655b0a6c59f4b814cf3c756f00dc50f3

Reading copy · 4,938 bytes
6120ac3d1ac5c0da8bec33a413138b5cdcbbb6a8bf6c7a20896db51b85b4309a

Labor Code § 2699

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Stats. 2025, ch. 67, § 134 (AB 1170), effective January 1, 2026
Relevant passages: § 2699(a), (c)–(e), (g)–(k), (m)–(p), (v)

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Entire section (a)–(v), including amendment note and prior-notice applicability exception.

Retained source · 39,383 bytes
9c249751a2943a70da4c4dfa00747f6db368aa10584756260d4f6cafe8f5a99d

Reading copy · 17,987 bytes
3912aed2a91e009ac0f6fffe173b67e27e1dfa8fab17ee106caccd544e78f07f

Labor Code § 2699 — operative pre-2024 reform text

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Stats. 2016, ch. 31, § 189 (SB 836), before AB 2288 (2024)
Relevant passages: Former § 2699(a), (c), (e)(2), (g)(1), (i)–(j)

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Complete historical § 2699(a)–(n), retained from official #s1 historical bill section; current code displayed above it is a separate version.

Retained source · 17,150 bytes
6c5dd2cb56335a7dd7187722458b15e4ffe05bc53f2799f368e0332835abec17

Reading copy · 7,597 bytes
af3932f4034d9187ab3067b6dff5c07eb86a924083811bd0591a970154439970

Labor Code § 2699.3

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Stats. 2025, ch. 67, § 135 (AB 1170), effective January 1, 2026
Relevant passages: § 2699.3(a)–(c), (f)–(g)

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Entire section (a)–(g), including distinct safety track, employer-size and wage-statement cure routes, early evaluation and operative note.

Retained source · 50,389 bytes
13dfdaea5d3aacaa7c7c2941f3f143454f45cd5fd2606b923480e040f8cc2052

Reading copy · 22,646 bytes
cf4c8e4ef13daa832295cb0be1fd5b289ab5b1c80669f60337771bbe6cbb347d

Labor Code § 510

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Stats. 1999, ch. 134, § 4, effective January 1, 2000
Relevant passages: § 510(a)–(c)

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Entire section (a)–(c), including tiers, no combined overtime rates, alternative-workweek exceptions and amendment note.

Retained source · 5,897 bytes
f7f3d227c7390609c881b4abffcb187deeb2929dbe17100e6b4f17170f209874

Reading copy · 2,154 bytes
451b0b2fe657816bba9373e3d6488d520ef5acde112ee0d70bd873b3acaf4200

Labor Code § 558

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Stats. 2015, ch. 783, § 1 (AB 970), effective January 1, 2016
Relevant passages: § 558(a)–(e)

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Entire section (a)–(e), including predicate coverage, fixed and wage amounts, commissioner and local-enforcement provisions, and amendment note.

Retained source · 6,743 bytes
5cf904af60845bc3ddf88db15dd7ff061abf4439fa94fa56cc673e89fd42a961

Reading copy · 2,506 bytes
8ea8552d279aae36f8f6d2a8246defbcbf5350258b8d76909a55ea63b4be4d56

Leeper v. Shipt, Inc. (2024) 107 Cal.App.5th 1001

Source: California Court of Appeal
Version: 2024-12-30 official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip pp. 3, 5–16

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Entire 16-page opinion, including footnotes, facts, statutory analysis, Kim/Adolph distinctions and disposition.

Retained source · 233,315 bytes
75133acde95a46c4f94b0f3618076ac5c7f0ac4459d99db90c6668af770040d9

Reading copy · 25,660 bytes
5017f987a803ab6c24aae35df3d53f923eb4b2e2fff78213e432352c7f2b2383

Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094

Source: California Supreme Court; official-reporter facsimile preserved by Caselaw Access Project
Version: Filed 2007-04-16; S140308; official-reporter facsimile
Relevant passages: 40 Cal.4th pp. 1102–1104, 1109–1110, 1114

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Limitations question and wage/penalty framework, reporter pp. 1102–1104; ultimate limitations holding at p. 1114. Prior verified opinion preparation reused; p. 1114 visually checked against reporter facsimile.

Retained source · 1,620,174 bytes
5d712faffe524ec099c78b0d9581ab592e42c9dc01f48d968daef5dcbb960657

Reading copy · 67,590 bytes
40592f858cae64b9fa6c2786dc26500724522f27c5e038642d1aabd5dd0ebecd

Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc. (2022) 13 Cal.5th 93

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: Filed 2022-05-23; S258966; official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip opinion pp. 1–2, 8–10, 32–33, 40–41

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Wage-status reasoning, § 203 timing and willfulness discussion, § 226 reporting analysis, remand/disposition, and adjoining qualifications; relevant units at slip pp. 1–2, 8–10, 32–33, 40–41.

Retained source · 506,695 bytes
00eb8ec514a6f9f9fe38c02df71ade4375181c5405e535c9c796a89248b73343

Reading copy · 85,312 bytes
58ea7f89282516b6219abe65f79bd2272bd272b10c0a061841bbc471a8898673

Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc. (2024) 15 Cal.5th 1056

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: Filed 2024-05-06; S279397; official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip opinion pp. 1–2, 38–44, including fns. 10–11

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Introductory procedural and statutory question, entire final rule/application/disposition unit, slip pp. 1–2 and 38–44, including fns. 10–11; distinguishes underlying duty from penalty scienter.

Retained source · 503,097 bytes
6093103c243629214d9643485a5edca556fcc57b88d2e9e452d3316f0e0fb22d

Reading copy · 92,953 bytes
f8276ea7a113206f9944b2b1087ee2754d7b83df174aeb11844b0ab3e7a576c5

November 3, 2026 oral argument calendar — Leeper, S289305

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: Filed 2026-10-14; hearing scheduled 2026-11-03
Relevant passages: Calendar p. 1; issue statement pp. 2–3

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Calendar header/date, entire Leeper setting and complete Leeper issue statement, including the calendar’s summary qualification.

Retained source · 194,526 bytes
af66fd2d3b2a5e1f68fd3657a786f2175679eedc9d924f5ce5e826ad1d7c52f9

Reading copy · 5,632 bytes
e7fe965b914d5a0c3624dce48dd666b4378a5748c1a1ac89f60869b7c7fb0c61

November 3, 2026 Oral Argument Cases — official briefs page

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: HTTP capture 2026-10-19 03:43 UTC (October 18 Pacific)
Relevant passages: Heading and S289305 — LEEPER v. SHIPT unit

Source identity and integrity

Original HTTP HTML

Reviewed unit: Page title/date and complete S289305 section checked as current pending-argument confirmation; party briefs are not treated as court holdings.

Retained source · 384,357 bytes
e64c24f3ae60d3186014f7a5cd16709658c07d4a7ddaeecd7ea5ded3b53c9e4a

Reading copy · 19,263 bytes
b076e839062d339730b4b61cc42fb0ce3a63c9f74df0ab51a77a650030cb1e67

Quach v. California Commerce Club, Inc. (2024) 16 Cal.5th 562

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: 2024-07-25 official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip pp. 1–2, 9, 22 & fn. 4

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Introductory holding; discussion of Iskanian’s prejudice rule at slip p. 9; abrogation and scope at slip p. 22 fn. 4.

Retained source · 403,983 bytes
4c628997302884c70f9867e0da8eb05caf6801a340274386bf21f82e0378c65a

Reading copy · 62,376 bytes
5c90f1bc68ba0614e9081960b5a6eb17a1026414160d5cc0fa4581f446d17a2b

SB 92 — Stats. 2024, ch. 45

Source: California Legislative Information
Version: Chaptered July 1, 2024; selected 07/01/24 - Chaptered
Relevant passages: §§ 1–2, including replacement § 2699.3(c), (f), (g); §§ 3, 6–7

Source identity and integrity

Official browser DOM capture with full identified unit text and HTML

Reviewed unit: Chaptered caption/digest and complete replacement § 2699.3 in § 2, including (c), (f), (g); comparison to current complete section; § 3 applicability and §§ 6–7 operative/urgency clauses. Section 1 retained as the prior interim version, not presented as current.

Retained source · 109,689 bytes
f95d97937e3a717d0dfa41f7eaac209ad7992fa92dd16989808438ec74ddf5f9

Reading copy · 48,438 bytes
4336f7a5273cf4848e32e041823813acbcab977f7f0413f31ec7968fc703fc2c

Supreme Court minutes — Leeper review grant and citation status

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: 2025-04-16 order, printed p. 470
Relevant passages: Printed p. 470, S289305

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Complete S289305 minute entry, including issues, briefing designation, citation-status order and denial of depublication.

Retained source · 367,000 bytes
87eab8a7c1b744ab00b501c081792fd709982a7f8b20f750fd1439b8be40241c

Reading copy · 73,980 bytes
3b7d9637b5ae6f1d4189879206a451a1bf976ae1c57df5c15f9a56dfb1723754

Troester v. Starbucks Corp. (2018) 5 Cal.5th 829

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: Filed 2018-07-26; S234969; official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip opinion pp. 1–3, 13–17, 19–21

Source identity and integrity

Complete primary-source PDF and mechanically extracted complete reading; unchanged prior capture

Reviewed unit: Question presented, statutory/background-doctrine distinctions, rest-period analogy, practical application and complete reserved-question conclusion, slip pp. 1–3, 13–17, 19–21; neighboring concurrence material checked for attribution.

Retained source · 493,168 bytes
6ee6a316ff1aaa8d053a06aa2ab77c51d5fb1b2289e311fbbebb716d8242fa4a

Reading copy · 69,862 bytes
a89a3e1fc3846f036f355014b94d578cec8859fdcad84b355ec40048414c23ce

Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 596 U.S. 639

Source: Supreme Court of the United States
Version: 2022-06-15; official U.S. Reports page proof
Relevant passages: 596 U.S. pp. 647–649, 659–664

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: PAGA framework at pp. 647–649; complete Parts III–IV, pp. 659–663, and Sotomayor concurrence pp. 663–664; surrounding substantive-rights discussion.

Retained source · 290,042 bytes
04de0530b297067d10c9f63230646000a1600ff432d262c7da7ceb35cb14a89e

Reading copy · 65,017 bytes
354df339dd9750169e2cea61f90e1b73f0fe1bacec857fff4e2167151925487f

Wesson v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLC (2021) 68 Cal.App.5th 746

Source: California Court of Appeal
Version: 2021-09-09 official opinion; certified for partial publication
Relevant passages: Official slip pp. 2–4, 29–32; reporter p. 767 corroborated by Estrada

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Introduction and complete published Discussion A.2 manageability-authority unit (slip pp. 29–32), including footnote 14.

Retained source · 335,861 bytes
29920cb3d7730168a298dab201acb27bd9d6f94783615d896fe5e0a1f7c471b0

Reading copy · 75,063 bytes
5edc5c1ffe4bdf89bf55d2885a18fc3774fa53dd539a260e8f1c32ffb61cc1f2

ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court (2019) 8 Cal.5th 175

Source: California Supreme Court
Version: 2019-09-12 official slip opinion
Relevant passages: Official slip pp. 7–12, 28–29

Source identity and integrity

Unchanged publisher PDF

Reviewed unit: Complete Part II statutory framework (slip pp. 7–12), concluding Part III wage distinction and complete Part IV consequences (pp. 28–29).

Retained source · 501,878 bytes
75001e2c0a62dc554b40c8b3875299652a43a28cc11b47a5236ccb1be37295ad

Reading copy · 59,077 bytes
ba7f5cfe36eee7dd77c2e94258f92e28d7281498dd718d6322aadc1021115d58